In 1981 Guth proposed a radical new theory of the early universe,
the inflationary model, which can explain a number of fundamental
problems in Cosmology: e.g. why is the Universe so nearly
homogeneous and spatially flat, and why are there no magnetic
monopoles or other remnants of Grand Unified phase transitions? The
inflationary model has since become a paradigm in modern cosmology
(see e.g.
Kolb and Turner 1990, Linde 1990). The key idea,
common to all models of inflation, is that at
some very early time after the Big Bang, the Universe
underwent a rapid near-exponential expansion increasing in size by a
factor
. The large expansion during the inflationary phase
dilutes the abundance of remnant monopoles and smooths any initial
spatial curvature leading to a Universe that is very nearly spatially
flat at the present epoch. Furthermore, quantum fluctuations produced
during inflation are stretched in scale by many orders of magnitude
producing density fluctuations that can then grow by gravity to make the
galaxies and clusters of galaxies seen in the Universe today
(Guth & Pi 1982, Hawking 1982, Bardeen, Steinhardt & Turner 1983).
![]() |
|
By studying the CMB anisotropies we can determine the nature of the
fluctuations as they were at the time that they were generated, less
than
seconds after the Big Bang. The CMB
anisotropies offer a direct test, not only of whether inflation took
place, but also of the specific details of the inflationary mechanism.
For example, in the simplest inflationary
models, the energy density of the Universe is dominated by a single
scalar field
(called the inflaton field). The dynamics of the inflaton field
is governed by an effective potential
. In principle,
the potential
, the nature of the inflaton field and its
couplings to other fields should be deducible from fundamental physics,
but at present we have so few experimental constraints on physics
at energies > 1015 GeV that the parameters of inflationary models,
which determine the amplitudes and spectra of the primordial fluctuations,
are almost arbitrary. Observations of the CMB anisotropies
are thus one of the few ways of setting firm experimental constraints
on theories at ultra-high energies of
GeV. Nevertheless,
successful inflationary models (i.e. models that produce
sufficient expansion) lead to some predictions that depend only
weakly on specific details such as the shape of the inflaton potential.
These are as follows:
An exactly exponential (de Sitter) expansion during inflation would
lead to precisely scale invariant density and gravitational wave
spectra with indices ns = 1 and nt =0 respectively.
In order to match on to Friedman-Robertson-Walker models, the
expansion rate must slow down at the end of inflation. This leads
to small deviations from a purely scale invariant spectrum in any
realistic inflationary model that depend on the precise shape of
the potential
. However, extreme fine tuning is required
to produce inflationary models with spectral indices that lie
outside the bounds
and
(Steinhardt 1996, Bond 1996) shown by the heavy box in
Figure 1.6.
Furthermore, the ratio r=C2t/C2s of the CMB quadrupoles from gravitational wave (tensor) and density perturbation (scalar) components depends on the shape of the potential and hence on the spectral indices ns and nt. Inflationary models can be grouped into two categories, one in which nt = ns - 1 and the ratio
| r = 7 ( 1 - ns), | (10) |
Figure 1.7 illustrates the power of PLANCK for testing
inflationary models. Here we have assumed a pure power law
fluctuation spectrum with scalar spectral index ns=1 and we have
estimated the error on the determination of the spectral index from an
all-sky experiment as the number of multipoles is increased. The
dotted lines show the limits on ns from an experiment with the same
angular resolution and sensitivity as the 2 year COBE data; the
error on n approaches
at multipoles
corresponding to the resolution limit of the COBE maps. The solid
lines show the
errors on ns from an experiment with the
sensitivity of PLANCK. Here the error on ns is determined
primarily by ``cosmic variance'' (equation 1.9) and decreases rapidly
to
at
. An experiment with the
sensitivity and resolution of PLANCK can therefore measure
the spectral index with an accuracy that is much smaller than the
width of the heavy box plotted in Figure 1.8 and can therefore
distinguish between different theories of inflation. The ability to
measure small deviations from a precise scale invariant spectrum will
provide tight constraints on the form of the inflationary potential
and hence on fundamental physics at energies
GeV.

In the next section, we extend the simple analysis of Figure 1.7 to the full range of multipoles accessible to PLANCK and to a wide range of cosmological parameters including the inflationary parameters ns, nt and r.